Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applying procedural programming" » "coder coder applying potential programming" (Expand search), "coder coder appellate procedural programming" (Expand search), "coder coder advancing procedural programming" (Expand search), "coder coder laudering procedural programming" (Expand search), "coder model applying procedural programming" (Expand search), "coder after applying procedural programming" (Expand search), "coder could applying procedural programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder applying procedural programming" (Expand search), "code code applying procedural programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec applying procedural programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applying procedural programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applying procedural programming ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder applying procedural programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.