Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applying porter programming" » "coder coder applying cortex programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying order programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying motor programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying porter's programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying context programming" (Expand search), "coder model applying porter programming" (Expand search), "coder after applying porter programming" (Expand search), "coder could applying porter programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder applying porter programming" (Expand search), "code code applying porter programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec applying porter programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applying porter programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applying porter programming ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder applying porter programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.