Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applying optical programming" » "coder coder applying pascal programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying logical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying musical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying critical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying lexical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying empirical programming" (Expand search), "coder model applying optical programming" (Expand search), "coder after applying optical programming" (Expand search), "coder could applying optical programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder applying optical programming" (Expand search), "code code applying optical programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec applying optical programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applying optical programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applying optical programming ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder applying optical programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.