Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applying one programming" » "coder coder applying cone programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying line programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying core programming" (Expand search), "coder model applying one programming" (Expand search), "coder after applying one programming" (Expand search), "coder could applying one programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying on programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying bond programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying fine programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder applying one programming" (Expand search), "code code applying one programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec applying one programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applying one programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applying one programming ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder applying one programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.