Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applying octave programming" » "coder coder applying stage programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying objective programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying active programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying ductile programming" (Expand search), "coder model applying octave programming" (Expand search), "coder after applying octave programming" (Expand search), "coder could applying octave programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder applying octave programming" (Expand search), "code code applying octave programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec applying octave programming" (Expand search)
"via python python python programming" » "via pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "via piton python python programming" (Expand search), "via pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applying octave programming\") OR (\"via python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applying octave programming ) OR ( via python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder applying octave programming") OR ("via python python python programming"))*.