Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applying new programming" » "coder coder applying cone programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying free programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying cell programming" (Expand search), "coder model applying new programming" (Expand search), "coder after applying new programming" (Expand search), "coder could applying new programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying deep programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying lean programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying _ programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder applying new programming" (Expand search), "code code applying new programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec applying new programming" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder applying new programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applying new programming\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applying new programming ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder applying new programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.