Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applying low programming" » "coder coder applying go programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying new programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying box programming" (Expand search), "coder model applying low programming" (Expand search), "coder after applying low programming" (Expand search), "coder could applying low programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying lean programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying _ programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying an programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder applying low programming" (Expand search), "code code applying low programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec applying low programming" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applying low programming\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applying low programming ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder applying low programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.