Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applying local programming" » "coder coder applying logical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying goal programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying foetal programming" (Expand search), "coder model applying local programming" (Expand search), "coder after applying local programming" (Expand search), "coder could applying local programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying lexical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying formal programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder applying local programming" (Expand search), "code code applying local programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec applying local programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applying local programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applying local programming ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder applying local programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.