Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applying life programming" » "coder coder applying line programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying live programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying time programming" (Expand search), "coder model applying life programming" (Expand search), "coder after applying life programming" (Expand search), "coder could applying life programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying linear programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying large programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying low programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder applying life programming" (Expand search), "code code applying life programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec applying life programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder applying life programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applying life programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applying life programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder applying life programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.