Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applying learning programming" » "coder coder applying learning programme" (Expand search), "coder coder applying teaching programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying learning program" (Expand search), "coder coder analysing learning programming" (Expand search), "coder coder spelling learning programming" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling learning programming" (Expand search), "coder model applying learning programming" (Expand search), "coder after applying learning programming" (Expand search), "coder could applying learning programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder applying learning programming" (Expand search), "code code applying learning programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec applying learning programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder applying learning programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applying learning programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applying learning programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder applying learning programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.