Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applying lean programming" » "coder coder applying learn programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying means programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying goal programming" (Expand search), "coder model applying lean programming" (Expand search), "coder after applying lean programming" (Expand search), "coder could applying lean programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying an programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying low programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying deep programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder applying lean programming" (Expand search), "code code applying lean programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec applying lean programming" (Expand search)
"in python pythons python programming" » "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in python piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pythons python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder applying lean programming") OR ("in python pythons python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applying lean programming\") OR (\"in python pythons python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applying lean programming ) OR ( in python pythons python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder applying lean programming") OR ("in python pythons python programming"))*.