Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applying larval programming" » "coder coder applying level programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying pascal programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying lineal programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying large programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying formal programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying local programming" (Expand search), "coder model applying larval programming" (Expand search), "coder after applying larval programming" (Expand search), "coder could applying larval programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder applying larval programming" (Expand search), "code code applying larval programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec applying larval programming" (Expand search)
"via python python python programming" » "via pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "via piton python python programming" (Expand search), "via pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applying larval programming\") OR (\"via python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applying larval programming ) OR ( via python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder applying larval programming") OR ("via python python python programming"))*.