Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applying inductive programming" » "coder coder applying disjunctive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying objective programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying ductile programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying incentives programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying innovative programming" (Expand search), "coder model applying inductive programming" (Expand search), "coder after applying inductive programming" (Expand search), "coder could applying inductive programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder applying inductive programming" (Expand search), "code code applying inductive programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec applying inductive programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applying inductive programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applying inductive programming ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder applying inductive programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.