Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applying in programming" » "coder model applying in programming" (Expand search), "coder after applying in programming" (Expand search), "coder could applying in programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying and programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying _ programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying c programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder applying in programming" (Expand search), "code code applying in programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec applying in programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying an programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying iso programming" (Expand search)
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applying in programming\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applying in programming ) OR ( in pythons python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder applying in programming") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))*.