Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applying declarative programming" » "coder coder applying reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying deliberative programming" (Expand search), "coder coder assessing declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying gelatine programming" (Expand search), "coder model applying declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder after applying declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder could applying declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder applying declarative programming" (Expand search), "code code applying declarative programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec applying declarative programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applying declarative programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applying declarative programming ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder applying declarative programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.