Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applying control processing" » "coder coder applying central processing" (Expand search), "coder coder applying controlled processing" (Expand search), "coder coder applying control process" (Expand search), "coder coder applying context processing" (Expand search), "coder coder applying boron processing" (Expand search), "coder model applying control processing" (Expand search), "coder after applying control processing" (Expand search), "coder could applying control processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder applying control processing" (Expand search), "code code applying control processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec applying control processing" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder applying control processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applying control processing\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applying control processing ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder applying control processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.