Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applying conservative programming" » "coder coder applying generative programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying constraint programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying constrained programming" (Expand search), "coder coder using conservative programming" (Expand search), "coder coder being conservative programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying innovative programming" (Expand search), "coder model applying conservative programming" (Expand search), "coder after applying conservative programming" (Expand search), "coder could applying conservative programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder applying conservative programming" (Expand search), "code code applying conservative programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec applying conservative programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applying conservative programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applying conservative programming ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder applying conservative programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.