Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applying child programming" » "coder coder applying cpld programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying cell programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying grid programming" (Expand search), "coder model applying child programming" (Expand search), "coder after applying child programming" (Expand search), "coder could applying child programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying high programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying hplc programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder applying child programming" (Expand search), "code code applying child programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec applying child programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder applying child programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applying child programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applying child programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder applying child programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.