Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applying box programming" » "coder coder applying by programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying go programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying co programming" (Expand search), "coder model applying box programming" (Expand search), "coder after applying box programming" (Expand search), "coder could applying box programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying bond programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying hot programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying boron programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder applying box programming" (Expand search), "code code applying box programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec applying box programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder applying box programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applying box programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applying box programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder applying box programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.