Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applied with programmable" » "coder coder applied in programmable" (Expand search), "coder coder applied field programmable" (Expand search), "coder coder applied using programmable" (Expand search), "coder codes applied with programmable" (Expand search), "coder model applied with programmable" (Expand search), "coder under applied with programmable" (Expand search), "coder coder supplied with programmable" (Expand search), "coder coder applied at programmable" (Expand search), "coder decoder applied with programmable" (Expand search), "code code applied with programmable" (Expand search), "decoder codec applied with programmable" (Expand search)
"via python python python programming" » "via pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "via piton python python programming" (Expand search), "via pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applied with programmable\") OR (\"via python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applied with programmable ) OR ( via python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder applied with programmable") OR ("via python python python programming"))*.