Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder and slice process" » "coder coder and police process" (Expand search), "coder coder and space process" (Expand search), "coder coder and place process" (Expand search), "coder decoder and slice process" (Expand search), "code code and slice process" (Expand search), "decoder codec and slice process" (Expand search), "coder code and slice process" (Expand search), "coder codes and slice process" (Expand search), "coder poder and slice process" (Expand search), "coder coder and alice process" (Expand search), "coder coder and slime process" (Expand search), "coder coder and slic process" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder and slice process") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder and slice process\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder and slice process ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder and slice process") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.