Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder and sequencial sampling" » "coder coder and sequential sampling" (Expand search), "coder coder and sequencing sampling" (Expand search), "coder coder based sequencial sampling" (Expand search), "coder decoder and sequencial sampling" (Expand search), "code code and sequencial sampling" (Expand search), "decoder codec and sequencial sampling" (Expand search), "coder code and sequencial sampling" (Expand search), "coder codes and sequencial sampling" (Expand search), "coder poder and sequencial sampling" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder and sequencial sampling") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder and sequencial sampling\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder and sequencial sampling ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder and sequencial sampling") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.