Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder and objects processing" » "coder coder and object processing" (Expand search), "coder coder and affects processing" (Expand search), "coder coder and subject processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder and objects processing" (Expand search), "code code and objects processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec and objects processing" (Expand search), "coder coder and subjects processing" (Expand search), "coder coder and objectives processing" (Expand search), "coder code and objects processing" (Expand search), "coder codes and objects processing" (Expand search), "coder poder and objects processing" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder and objects processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder and objects processing\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder and objects processing ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder and objects processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.