Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder and executable process" » "coder coder and executive process" (Expand search), "coder coder and execution process" (Expand search), "coder coder and executable models" (Expand search), "coder coder and excitable process" (Expand search), "coder coder into executable process" (Expand search), "coder decoder and executable process" (Expand search), "code code and executable process" (Expand search), "decoder codec and executable process" (Expand search), "coder code and executable process" (Expand search), "coder codes and executable process" (Expand search), "coder poder and executable process" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder and executable process") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder and executable process\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder and executable process ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder and executable process") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.