Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder and efficient process" » "coder coder and efficient processing" (Expand search), "coder coder and efficient access" (Expand search), "coder coder and efficient procedure" (Expand search), "coder coder an efficient process" (Expand search), "coder coder and efficiency process" (Expand search), "coder coder _ efficient process" (Expand search), "coder decoder and efficient process" (Expand search), "code code and efficient process" (Expand search), "decoder codec and efficient process" (Expand search), "coder code and efficient process" (Expand search), "coder codes and efficient process" (Expand search), "coder poder and efficient process" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder and efficient process") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder and efficient process\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder and efficient process ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder and efficient process") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.