Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder and affective programming" » "coder coder and objective programming" (Expand search), "coder coder and collective programming" (Expand search), "coder coder and reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder and effective programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder and affective programming" (Expand search), "code code and affective programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec and affective programming" (Expand search), "coder code and affective programming" (Expand search), "coder codes and affective programming" (Expand search), "coder poder and affective programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder and affective programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder and affective programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder and affective programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder and affective programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.