Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder analyzing lexical programming" » "coder coder analyzing logical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder analyzing textual programming" (Expand search), "coder coder analyzing musical programming" (Expand search), "coder coffee analyzing lexical programming" (Expand search), "coder cohort analyzing lexical programming" (Expand search), "coder home analyzing lexical programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder analyzing lexical programming" (Expand search), "code code analyzing lexical programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec analyzing lexical programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder analyzing lexical programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder analyzing lexical programming ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder analyzing lexical programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.