Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder allocation conic programming" » "coder coder allocation logic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder allocation cone programming" (Expand search), "coder coder allocation convex programming" (Expand search), "coder power allocation conic programming" (Expand search), "coder order allocation conic programming" (Expand search), "coder over allocation conic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder allocation economic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder allocation policy programming" (Expand search), "coder coder allocation on programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder allocation conic programming" (Expand search), "code code allocation conic programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec allocation conic programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder allocation conic programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder allocation conic programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder allocation conic programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder allocation conic programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.