Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder affective objects programming" » "coder coder affective objective programming" (Expand search), "coder coder affective subject programming" (Expand search), "coder coder affective robots programming" (Expand search), "coder coder affective aspects programming" (Expand search), "coder coder fictive objects programming" (Expand search), "coder coder affective agents programming" (Expand search), "coder under affective objects programming" (Expand search), "coder model affective objects programming" (Expand search), "coder bodies affective objects programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder affective objects programming" (Expand search), "code code affective objects programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec affective objects programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder affective objects programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder affective objects programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder affective objects programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder affective objects programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.