Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder affecting logical programming" » "coder coder affecting logic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder affecting physical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder affecting goal programming" (Expand search), "coder coder detecting logical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder affectivity logical programming" (Expand search), "coder cases affecting logical programming" (Expand search), "coder or affecting logical programming" (Expand search), "coder doses affecting logical programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder affecting logical programming" (Expand search), "code code affecting logical programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec affecting logical programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder affecting logical programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder affecting logical programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder affecting logical programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder affecting logical programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.