Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder affect erlang programming" » "coder coder affect plane programming" (Expand search), "coder coder affect plant programming" (Expand search), "coder coder affect learning programming" (Expand search), "coder coder affect upland programming" (Expand search), "coder coder affect brand programming" (Expand search), "coder cover affect erlang programming" (Expand search), "coder order affect erlang programming" (Expand search), "coder color affect erlang programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder affect erlang programming" (Expand search), "code code affect erlang programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec affect erlang programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder affect erlang programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder affect erlang programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder affect erlang programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder affect erlang programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.