Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder adoption patterns programming" » "coder coder adoption paternal programming" (Expand search), "coder coder adoption maternal programming" (Expand search), "coder coder adoption patterns program" (Expand search), "coder coder adaptation patterns programming" (Expand search), "coder coder radiation patterns programming" (Expand search), "coder coder motion patterns programming" (Expand search), "coder code adoption patterns programming" (Expand search), "coder poder adoptio patterns programming" (Expand search), "coder broker adoption patterns programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder adoption patterns programming" (Expand search), "code code adoption patterns programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec adoption patterns programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder adoption patterns programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder adoption patterns programming ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder adoption patterns programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.