Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder adoption paternal programming" » "coder coder adoption internet programming" (Expand search), "coder coder adoption fractional programming" (Expand search), "coder coder adoption parallel programming" (Expand search), "coder coder adoption patterns programming" (Expand search), "coder coder adoption potential programming" (Expand search), "coder coder affection paternal programming" (Expand search), "coder code adoption paternal programming" (Expand search), "coder poder adoptio paternal programming" (Expand search), "coder broker adoption paternal programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder adoption paternal programming" (Expand search), "code code adoption paternal programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec adoption paternal programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder adoption paternal programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder adoption paternal programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder adoption paternal programming ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.