Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder adding logical programming" » "coder coder adding logic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder adding physical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder adding goal programming" (Expand search), "coder coder adding local programming" (Expand search), "coder coder adding lexical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder learning logical programming" (Expand search), "coder or adding logical programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder adding logical programming" (Expand search), "code code adding logical programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec adding logical programming" (Expand search)
"in python pythin python programming" » "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythons python programming" (Expand search), "in python piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder adding logical programming") OR ("in python pythin python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder adding logical programming\") OR (\"in python pythin python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder adding logical programming ) OR ( in python pythin python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder adding logical programming") OR ("in python pythin python programming"))*.