Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder adaptation convex programming" » "coder coder adaptation cone programming" (Expand search), "coder coder adaptation computer programming" (Expand search), "coder coder adaptation concept programming" (Expand search), "coder coder adaptation connect programming" (Expand search), "coder coder adaptation cordel programming" (Expand search), "coder model adaptation convex programming" (Expand search), "coder codon adaptation convex programming" (Expand search), "coder code adaptations convex programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder adaptation convex programming" (Expand search), "code code adaptation convex programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec adaptation convex programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder adaptation convex programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder adaptation convex programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder adaptation convex programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder adaptation convex programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.