Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder adaptation algorithm proposal" » "coder coder adaptive algorithm proposal" (Expand search), "coder coder allocation algorithm proposal" (Expand search), "coder coder computation algorithms proposal" (Expand search), "coder model adaptation algorithm proposal" (Expand search), "coder codon adaptation algorithm proposal" (Expand search), "coder code adaptations algorithm proposal" (Expand search), "coder decoder adaptation algorithm proposal" (Expand search), "code code adaptation algorithm proposal" (Expand search), "decoder codec adaptation algorithm proposal" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder adaptation algorithm proposal") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder adaptation algorithm proposal\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder adaptation algorithm proposal ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder adaptation algorithm proposal") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.