Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder code using vba code" » "code code using vba code" (Expand search), "modern code using vba code" (Expand search), "color code using vba code" (Expand search), "coder made using vba code" (Expand search), "coder coding using vba code" (Expand search), "coder code using via code" (Expand search), "coder code using vsat code" (Expand search), "coder code using vmat code" (Expand search), "coder code using bar code" (Expand search), "coder code using by code" (Expand search), "coder code using be code" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code using vba code\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code using vba code ) OR ( in pythons python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code using vba code") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))*.