Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code using subsampling protocol" » "coder code using sampling protocol" (Expand search), "coder code using sampling protocols" (Expand search), "coder code using subtitling protocol" (Expand search), "coder code and subsampling protocol" (Expand search), "code code using subsampling protocol" (Expand search), "modern code using subsampling protocol" (Expand search), "color code using subsampling protocol" (Expand search), "coder made using subsampling protocol" (Expand search), "coder coding using subsampling protocol" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code using subsampling protocol\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code using subsampling protocol ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code using subsampling protocol") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.