Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code using stimulative function" » "coder code using legislative function" (Expand search), "coder code using normative function" (Expand search), "coder code using stimulus function" (Expand search), "coder code using simulation function" (Expand search), "coder code using simulate function" (Expand search), "coder code using stimulated function" (Expand search), "code code using stimulative function" (Expand search), "modern code using stimulative function" (Expand search), "color code using stimulative function" (Expand search), "coder made using stimulative function" (Expand search), "coder coding using stimulative function" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code using stimulative function\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code using stimulative function ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code using stimulative function") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.