Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code using static processing" » "coder code using state processing" (Expand search), "coder code using syntactic processing" (Expand search), "coder code using semantic processing" (Expand search), "coder code using spatial processing" (Expand search), "code code using static processing" (Expand search), "modern code using static processing" (Expand search), "color code using static processing" (Expand search), "coder made using static processing" (Expand search), "coder coding using static processing" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder code using static processing") OR ("api python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code using static processing\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code using static processing ) OR ( api python python python programming ))*.