Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code using static complexity" » "coder code using syntatic complexity" (Expand search), "coder code using state complexity" (Expand search), "coder code using states complexity" (Expand search), "coder code using semantic complexity" (Expand search), "coder code using spatial complexity" (Expand search), "code code using static complexity" (Expand search), "modern code using static complexity" (Expand search), "color code using static complexity" (Expand search), "coder made using static complexity" (Expand search), "coder coding using static complexity" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder code using static complexity") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code using static complexity\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code using static complexity ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.