Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code using sequential learning" » "coder code using sequence learning" (Expand search), "coder code using experiential learning" (Expand search), "coder code in sequential learning" (Expand search), "coder code and sequential learning" (Expand search), "coder code with sequential learning" (Expand search), "code code using sequential learning" (Expand search), "modern code using sequential learning" (Expand search), "color code using sequential learning" (Expand search), "coder made using sequential learning" (Expand search), "coder coding using sequential learning" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code using sequential learning\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code using sequential learning ) OR ( api python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code using sequential learning") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.