Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code using sequence mining" » "coder code using sequence typing" (Expand search), "coder code using sequence using" (Expand search), "coder code using sequence learning" (Expand search), "coder code using frequency mining" (Expand search), "coder code single sequence mining" (Expand search), "coder code mixing sequence mining" (Expand search), "code code using sequence mining" (Expand search), "modern code using sequence mining" (Expand search), "color code using sequence mining" (Expand search), "coder made using sequence mining" (Expand search), "coder coding using sequence mining" (Expand search)
"rpa python python python programming" » "rpa pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa piton python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "via python python python programming" (Expand search), "api python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code using sequence mining\") OR (\"rpa python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code using sequence mining ) OR ( rpa python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code using sequence mining") OR ("rpa python python python programming"))*.