Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code using sequence generation" » "coder code using frequency generation" (Expand search), "coder code using sequence conservation" (Expand search), "coder code using sequence annotation" (Expand search), "coder code single sequence generation" (Expand search), "coder code mixing sequence generation" (Expand search), "code code using sequence generation" (Expand search), "modern code using sequence generation" (Expand search), "color code using sequence generation" (Expand search), "coder made using sequence generation" (Expand search), "coder coding using sequence generation" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code using sequence generation\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code using sequence generation ) OR ( api python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code using sequence generation") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.