Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code using recurrent processing" » "coder code using current processing" (Expand search), "coder code using document processing" (Expand search), "coder code using recursive processing" (Expand search), "coder code in recurrent processing" (Expand search), "code code using recurrent processing" (Expand search), "modern code using recurrent processing" (Expand search), "color code using recurrent processing" (Expand search), "coder made using recurrent processing" (Expand search), "coder coding using recurrent processing" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code using recurrent processing\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code using recurrent processing ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code using recurrent processing") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.