Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code using recurrence processing" » "coder code using recurrence progression" (Expand search), "coder code using sequence processing" (Expand search), "coder code using recursive processing" (Expand search), "coder code using recurrent processing" (Expand search), "coder code using reference processing" (Expand search), "coder code and recurrence processing" (Expand search), "code code using recurrence processing" (Expand search), "modern code using recurrence processing" (Expand search), "color code using recurrence processing" (Expand search), "coder made using recurrence processing" (Expand search), "coder coding using recurrence processing" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder code using recurrence processing") OR ("api python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code using recurrence processing\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code using recurrence processing ) OR ( api python python python programming ))*.