Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder code using r coverage" » "code code using r coverage" (Expand search), "modern code using r coverage" (Expand search), "color code using r coverage" (Expand search), "coder made using r coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding using r coverage" (Expand search), "coder code using _ coverage" (Expand search), "coder code using l coverage" (Expand search), "coder code using war coverage" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code using r coverage\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code using r coverage ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code using r coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.