Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder code using path coverage" » "coder code using earth coverage" (Expand search), "coder code using with coverage" (Expand search), "coder code using data coverage" (Expand search), "code code using path coverage" (Expand search), "modern code using path coverage" (Expand search), "color code using path coverage" (Expand search), "coder made using path coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding using path coverage" (Expand search), "coder code cutting path coverage" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder code using path coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code using path coverage\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code using path coverage ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code using path coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.