Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code using insertion processes" » "coder code using inspection processes" (Expand search), "coder code using insertion process" (Expand search), "coder code using injection processes" (Expand search), "coder code using inertial processes" (Expand search), "coder code using induction processes" (Expand search), "coder code using information processes" (Expand search), "code code using insertion processes" (Expand search), "modern code using insertion processes" (Expand search), "color code using insertion processes" (Expand search), "coder made using insertion processes" (Expand search), "coder coding using insertion processes" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code using insertion processes\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code using insertion processes ) OR ( api python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code using insertion processes") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.