Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code using inductive programming" » "coder code using disjunctive programming" (Expand search), "coder code using objective programming" (Expand search), "coder code using reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder code using inductively programming" (Expand search), "coder code using conductive programming" (Expand search), "coder code using reductive programming" (Expand search), "code code using inductive programming" (Expand search), "modern code using inductive programming" (Expand search), "color code using inductive programming" (Expand search), "coder made using inductive programming" (Expand search), "coder coding using inductive programming" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code using inductive programming\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code using inductive programming ) OR ( api python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code using inductive programming") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.